IMSLP Forums

IMSLP's Main Page looks absolutely abysmal when viewed using Dark Reader, for example.

I notice that these errors occur at my first 2-3 downloads on IMSLP from the point I start Microsoft Edge , even with the latest version. However, Mozilla Firefox doesn't seem to have this problem. Here're some screenshots I took: 28 July 2020 at 10:32 a.m. (Kuala Lumpur time zone) - Three attempts ...

I now realize that I'm replying to a thread made a year ago, so I don't know if this problem still needs resolving.

I understand your frustration regarding the 15-second wait time, but if you read the forum announcement here made 5 years ago, you'll see that this is an understandable and reasonable compromise that has to be made between rising costs (maintenance and legal) and making scores freely available. I do...

I might have experienced this problem too, although I haven't tried changing '.net' to '.org'. Here're some screenshots I took: 28 July 2020 at 10:32 a.m. (Kuala Lumpur time zone) - Three attempts to access the PDF scores by clicking on the same file link: 1st attempt - Error 521 2nd attempt - Error...

UPDATE: They are all fixed. Thanks Daphnis!

Which one(s) should be used for this page?

Done.

Don Giovanni done.
Next link

Thanks so much for the updates! Just for reference, the changes are as follows: Manuscript: Mss - No changes MssD - added n.d.[XXXX-YY] and n.d.[XXXX-YYYY] Holograph manuscript: MssAu - added XXXX-YY , n.d.(ca.XXXX-YY) and n.d.(ca.XXXX-YYYY) MssUA - added n.d.[XXXX-YY] and n.d.[XXXX-YYYY]

As far as I know (feel free to correct me), the valid date formatting methods are: XXXX n.d. n.d.(ca.XXXX) / n.d.(before XXXX) / n.d.(after XXXX) n.d.(ca.XXXX-YYYY) / n.d.(ca.XXXX-YY) n.d.[XXXX] n.d.[XXXX-YYYY] / n.d.[XXXX-YY] As far as I know, these are the 4 formatting templates for descriptions o...

In retrospect, I find this topic to be more fitting under the 'Categorization / Standardization' forum. Can this thread be moved there?

So does the 'Formatting dates' section need to be revised/updated?

From what I know, 'n.d.' stands for 'not dated', used to categorise scores with unknown date of publishing. Approximate dates or range of dates can be added if necessary, sometimes with 'ca.' (about/approximately). However, I keep seeing different formatting for it, especially for manuscript files. ...