IMSLP Forums

Sorry it is Flute meas. 44! I should proofread myself:-) In the complete Score. The flute part is OK. Cheers. Fixed now. bar 493: should be bar 495. Gotcha. Fixed now too. meas. 293 and 295: flute: 1st note: the flat is unnecessary: That's true. I think I'll keep it for now simply because the origi...

Fantastic. Thanks for that. I am aware such messages look in a very unpleasant tone to whoever is not familiar with this proofreading job :-) Haha no worries. You being straight to the point means I can read it easily and check off each thing you say. meas. 4: 2nd beam 1st note, put a natural. Could...

I will proofread both parts but give me a week or so to do it carefully :-) Thanks! That's very kind. I appreciate the time it'll take you. The Sibley-Rochester project has a probably better scan: https://urresearch.rochester.edu/institutionalPublicationPublicView.action?institutionalItemId=11008 T...

Hello IMSLP community, I recently worked on this piece, at the piano: https://imslp.org/wiki/Ballade_et_Danse_des_Sylphes,_Op.5_(Andersen,_Joachim) However, I found the IMSLP scan somewhat unclear to work with, especially when viewing the differences between sharps and naturals, at first glance. My ...