IMSLP Forums

It's probably best to use the Discussions feature and start a new discussion with your comments. Although these aren't super obvious once created, they do allow viewers to find relevant information on the piece.

Thanks, I'm just now getting a notification for this and missed the prior. Apologies for my error; I thought the "No" value worked.

Thanks for your contribution. The composer's page is now unlocked. Please let us know when complete.

Yes. What's the issue?

We're a little behind and working through a backlog. Your uploads for this piece have been tagged now.

Making an engraving with no editorial claims and no "originality" does not alter the copyright status of the manuscript. If the manuscript is in the public domain then so is the engraving. Even if the publisher claims a new copyright (which happens frequently), if upon comparison of the tw...

We're a little bit behind, but I've gone ahead and tagged this for you so it should now be available.

I'm sorry, the heading of "Free Recordings" cannot be changed, only the text which appears for the link. If you'd rather provide a link to an external recording another way you can use the {{YT}} template and put the link in the metadata for the work like in the "External Links" ...

Agreed. Although this is just default text which can be altered with additional contents in the template, the default is best to not state the word "Free".

Looks like the upload form doesn't parse work titles that have special characters in the name, specifically double quotes. It throws a fatal error when trying to submit. Just FYI.

Is support for hosting of recordings still planned?

I don't know. What does "assigned" mean in this context? Is it a factor in copyright determination or not?

Suggestions on the last piece here? Is "C" also the appropriate choice for tagging?

There's another related situation with Atterberg's Sinfonia per archi, Op. 53 . It was published by Atterberg himself (registered with the US copyright office on 11 April 1958, reg. no. EU522601) and then, according to the score, "assigned 1960 to E. Eulenburg, London." A search of the onl...

The complication here is the initial publication occurred in '37 (with a valid registration) and the miniature score occurred later (my assumption), so I don't know how this factors into the decision. There was no renewal for the '37 publication that I can find.