IMSLP Forums

Suggestions on the last piece here? Is "C" also the appropriate choice for tagging?

There's another related situation with Atterberg's Sinfonia per archi, Op. 53 . It was published by Atterberg himself (registered with the US copyright office on 11 April 1958, reg. no. EU522601) and then, according to the score, "assigned 1960 to E. Eulenburg, London." A search of the onl...

The complication here is the initial publication occurred in '37 (with a valid registration) and the miniature score occurred later (my assumption), so I don't know how this factors into the decision. There was no renewal for the '37 publication that I can find.

Kurt Atterberg's Ballade und Passacaglia, Op. 38 was published in 1937 by Eulenburg plate 5693. It was subsequently miniaturized and issued through their "Eulenburg Miniature Scores" division out of New York and given catalog number 883 and a new plate number 5804. When it was miniaturized...

Got it, I understand we will not grandfather such pieces in. But that aside, and out of my curiosity and for my own education, are you able to point to any authoritative sources or any documentation which support the claims you're making? Any prior precedent in which a typeset, made with permission,...

Ok, I understand. But would we not consider that a typeset of a preexisting piece which has already been licensed in this manner would be grandfathered in? Submitting new pieces of music is well understood that that ability has been deprecated and removed. Is this a derivative? No, it is not an edit...

we only allow non-free licenses such as this for specifically verified PRO members

Can you point me to where this is documented so I can pass it along to the copyright holder? It is not mentioned on the Subscriptions page nor any other page I can find.

you'd need to prove that there is permission granted to distribute a typeset. I have written permission from the copyright holder (composer's daughter) to typeset these pieces. But, further, how is typesetting them and uploading them to the exact same location as the original content considered red...

Thanks for the feedback. Can you provide any sort of example they could follow, if they wish, which would allow us to have their scores uploaded?

Although the point is probably moot, can you direct me to any authoritative source which states that a typeset of a manuscript (not an edition or arrangement) would be considered a derivative?

Please take a look at the sample I have added here to ensure the details and license are appropriate.

The Performance Restricted Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 1.0 license type is another one which was deprecated, but is there an exception when uploading typesets for an existing scanned work which has already been assigned this license? If not, then I take it users will not be able to upl...

Since we have deprecated use of the Creative Commons non-commercial license derivatives, are we able to upload typesets of otherwise public domain works (?) where the author wishes the content to only be available for non-commercial purposes? More context: The Erkki Melartin Society has produced bea...

It's manually matched but there isn't really a mechanism for changing matched entries yet, are there many of these? If not maybe I can manually change them in the database. I have only been told of two. Both concern Florent Schmitt. The Op. 11 Prélude is apparently incorrect and should point to htt...

Do we have any moderator tools to modify/change the commercial recordings associated with a given work page? I received a report of some inaccurate recordings being listed for a given work and wondering if we can manually override those if they're automatically assigned.