Page 1 of 1

Vivaldi GLoria

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 2:28 pm
by vinteuil
It would be nice to have these scores available. Also, the website from which they come might have more...

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 9:31 pm
by j077y_r0g3r
what gloria by vivaldi? RV 589 or RV 588 ?

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 9:38 pm
by j077y_r0g3r
probably the 589. Its more famous.

2 scores of that one in the cpdl.org archive

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 9:41 pm
by vinteuil
Well, we only have one of them... :D :wink:

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 9:42 pm
by j077y_r0g3r
but maybe it's better to buy an urtext version...30 bucks but a looooot more correct!

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 9:51 pm
by vinteuil
How do you know what the score looks like. It's blocked.

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 9:52 pm
by vinteuil
And that a looot is a huge exagerration. Oftentimes, the only difference is lack of fingerings/editorial additions, which are nice to have.

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:51 pm
by j077y_r0g3r
sorry man, I can't understand. What's a huge exageration? What is blocked?

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:52 pm
by j077y_r0g3r
oh now I undestand. Sorry.

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:59 pm
by j077y_r0g3r
I usually work with anastatic reprints, and trust me, there are a lot of people who think to be better than the composer and when they copy from the manuscript thery correct those that they think are mistakes...or they are not able to understand the notes written in a bad way....or simply they are not musicians but only people payed to copy...or they just copy from another modern edition!

its difficult enough to play philologically, so I think that more close to the original means less errors...

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:00 pm
by j077y_r0g3r
I looked at the score in the cpdl.org archive.... not the imslp one

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 1:46 am
by vinteuil
How do you know?
I know becasue of the sections - and there's a website address in misc. notes.