Horowitz' piano transcription of Sousa's "Stars & Stripes."
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 4:09 am
What is the current copyright status of Vladimir Horowitz’ famous transcription of John Philip Sousa’s march ‘‘The Stars and Stripes Forever” – in the three copyright regimes? I raise this question not just in regard to this piece, but also for the significant copyright issues that it raises.
Of course, Sousa’s march is PD everywhere. It was first published as a song in 1897. Sousa died in 1932.
On the web, there are currently several website that make available for downloading the sheet music of various aural transcriptions of Horowitz’ piano arrangement, using Horowitz’ recordings, TV performances and live performances as sources. For example, one of these websites, The Horowitz Scores Online (http://vkgfx.com/) offers four such aural transcriptions made by Gan, Yamaguchi, Jensen and Wada.
According to some of these websites, Horowitz made and began to play his transcription in 1944 when he became a US citizen. He never published or copyrighted his arrangement, supposedly because he was afraid that other pianists (his competition) would perform it. Now, everynote.com sells it for $3.44.
On Youtube, one can now see the Russian virtuoso Arcadi Volodos performing his own arrangement of Horowitz’s arrangement of Sousa’s “Stars and Stripes Forever” (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeGTPE1Z_qs). I speculate that Volodos never received permission from Horowitz to arrange Horowitz’ arrangement.
Elsewhere on this forum, I have read Carolus’ definitive statement regarding the lack of any connection between the recording of a work and a copyright of the underlying musical work on that recording. Carolus wrote: “Recording does not constitute publication under US law. This is established by both case law and congressional statements in amendments to the Copyright act itself (resulting from the court decisions).” I think that means Horowitz’s arrangement of “The Stars and Stripes Forever” is PD in the US.
However, Carolus’ statement about the US still leaves open the possibility that Horowitz’ arrangement might now be protected in Canada or the EU. But how can a work that was composed and performed in 1944 be protected in Canada or the EU now if Horowitz never published it or copyrighted it - or even permitted it to be published?
Do any of the publications on the web constitute a first edition under Editio Princeps – with all the rights that EP bestows in the EU and elsewhere?
I assume that none of the aural transcribers could copyright their transcriptions since their common goal was to produce as accurate notation as possible from the recordings, with no original material on their parts. I doubt anyone could claim a copyright for taking musical dictation.
The bottom line is: would IMSLP post one of these aural transcriptions if the sheet music was uploaded?
MS
Of course, Sousa’s march is PD everywhere. It was first published as a song in 1897. Sousa died in 1932.
On the web, there are currently several website that make available for downloading the sheet music of various aural transcriptions of Horowitz’ piano arrangement, using Horowitz’ recordings, TV performances and live performances as sources. For example, one of these websites, The Horowitz Scores Online (http://vkgfx.com/) offers four such aural transcriptions made by Gan, Yamaguchi, Jensen and Wada.
According to some of these websites, Horowitz made and began to play his transcription in 1944 when he became a US citizen. He never published or copyrighted his arrangement, supposedly because he was afraid that other pianists (his competition) would perform it. Now, everynote.com sells it for $3.44.
On Youtube, one can now see the Russian virtuoso Arcadi Volodos performing his own arrangement of Horowitz’s arrangement of Sousa’s “Stars and Stripes Forever” (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeGTPE1Z_qs). I speculate that Volodos never received permission from Horowitz to arrange Horowitz’ arrangement.
Elsewhere on this forum, I have read Carolus’ definitive statement regarding the lack of any connection between the recording of a work and a copyright of the underlying musical work on that recording. Carolus wrote: “Recording does not constitute publication under US law. This is established by both case law and congressional statements in amendments to the Copyright act itself (resulting from the court decisions).” I think that means Horowitz’s arrangement of “The Stars and Stripes Forever” is PD in the US.
However, Carolus’ statement about the US still leaves open the possibility that Horowitz’ arrangement might now be protected in Canada or the EU. But how can a work that was composed and performed in 1944 be protected in Canada or the EU now if Horowitz never published it or copyrighted it - or even permitted it to be published?
Do any of the publications on the web constitute a first edition under Editio Princeps – with all the rights that EP bestows in the EU and elsewhere?
I assume that none of the aural transcribers could copyright their transcriptions since their common goal was to produce as accurate notation as possible from the recordings, with no original material on their parts. I doubt anyone could claim a copyright for taking musical dictation.
The bottom line is: would IMSLP post one of these aural transcriptions if the sheet music was uploaded?
MS