Standard Instrumentation

Moderator: kcleung

BKhon

Re: Standard Instrumentation

Post by BKhon »

Sort of loosing track of what this post is supposed to be about. It's a fairly important issue. Here is what I included in my draft for the "General Information Guide":

Syntactical Rules:


1). The names of instruments should always appear in English.

2). The names of instruments need not be capitalized.

3). Instruments must be spelled completely, with no abbreviations.

4). Instruments must be separated by commas, and never with slashes.

5). Never use an & symbol.

General Guidelines:

6). The original instrumentation must be provided, rather than an arrangers instrumentation.

7). The orchestration must be provded, rather than simply stating "orchestra".

8). The instrumentation field can have several instrumentations, so long as they were the original conception of the composer.

9). Instrumental Ordering:

Orchestral: woodwinds, brass, percussion, harp/piano, strings (with score order within those groupings).

Solo instruments: Vocal/choral pieces: voices first, then instruments in score order or orchestra as above.

Exception: In a woodwind quintet, the horn is not the bass instrument, so bassoon should be listed last.

10). The cello part that follows the bass line of the keyboard part is a continuo part, and should not be listed as something separate to the continuo.

11). Instruments that are either offstage or optional should be listed last. Thus: "(+ ad lib.: 2 clarinets (B♭), tuba)", or "(+ offstage: 2 trumpets (C), trombone, tuba").

12). For a large orchestra, instruments can be provided on different lines according to family.

Specific Rules

13). Must use "English horn", and never Cor Anglais. Must use "Horn" and not French Horn. Must use "piano", and not piano forte, and "cello", never violincello.

14). The names of the oboe d'amore and the viola d'amore should always include the apostrophes, and take the plural forms oboes d'amore, violas d'amore.

15). The term "voices" should reserved only for solo vocalists, and never be applied to orchestral parts.

16). Choruses should always be described as mixed, male, female or children's when appropriate, with their composition shown in brackets using the standard abbreviation (e.g. "mixed chorus (SATB)", "mixed chorus (SSATTBB)", "male chorus (TTBB)", "female chorus (SSA)", unless they're in unison ("children's chorus")).


What thinks everyone? If there are any suggestions, feel free to include them in the actual draft (and don't feel limited to just the instrumentation field, you may edit anything in the manual, of course).
Melodia
active poster
Posts: 442
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 12:30 pm

Re: Standard Instrumentation

Post by Melodia »

I imagine a lot of people would disagree about using English Horn over Cor Anglais.
steltz
active poster
Posts: 1861
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:30 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human

Re: Standard Instrumentation

Post by steltz »

7) Probably should add "where known" -- we have a lot of vocal scores for obscure operas where only one aria or song survives and in vocal score format -- the original instrumentation of these might never be known.

And please add the doubling format (piccolo, Eb clarinet etc. "+" means a separate part, in brackets means included in one of the other parts), either under 9) in General Guidelines, or maybe it's a syntactical rule?

Otherwise, looking good! :D
bsteltz
pml
Copyright Reviewer
Posts: 1219
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 3:42 am
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Standard Instrumentation

Post by pml »

I’m curious about 5) – what have you got against the ampersand? (Not that I tend to use it, but I’m interested to know why it’s the target of such pique.)

I suspect there is a reason why many contributors have not followed your point 7), since not all full scores indicate the complete instrumentation on the first page of the score (or the original source has had such a complete listing removed from its pages). For these scores it would be necessary to work through the entire score to compile a list of the maximal instrumentation required.

Is it worthwhile retaining shorthand instrumentations alongside the full expanded instrumentation? (I happen to prefer the brief format for quickly reading off the orchestration of a work, even though I’m aware the format is obscure and inherently contains less information.)

As for 8), it is possible to type it without the bulletin board interpreting it as a smiley – put a tag such as in between the 8 and the bracket. 8)

Regards, PML
--
PML (talk)
BKhon

Re: Standard Instrumentation

Post by BKhon »

Fixed :D

As for number 5: Personally, I think it makes work pages look cluttered, and would much prefer to see the word "and". There isn't much of a technical reason.

Number 7: I changed to "when possible" :-)
Post Reply