Publication date and composition date- again- with an examp.
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:03 am
Hyperion Records recently in their notes to their recording of piano concertos by Wilhelm Taubert and Jacob Rosenhain pointed out that while the opus 73 concerto of the latter wasn't published until the 1870s or so, it may well have been composed some three or four decades earlier. This not that unusual instance keeps coming to my mind. Because something was published in 1850 does not mean it was composed "ca.1850" at least if "ca." means what it ordinarily means - so if you don't know when it was composed- just leave it blank, like the guidelines say to do.
(And especially don't just write in 1850 for the composition date entire "instead of" the publication date, as I notice some editors almost make a habit of. When this becomes a habit and you don't notice that the work in question is posthumously published, then voilĂ , you've just claimed that the work was composed post-death, a truly spiritual feat.)
(And especially don't just write in 1850 for the composition date entire "instead of" the publication date, as I notice some editors almost make a habit of. When this becomes a habit and you don't notice that the work in question is posthumously published, then voilĂ , you've just claimed that the work was composed post-death, a truly spiritual feat.)