Mademoiselle, not Madame Rochette

Reports of various issues on work pages.

Moderators: vinteuil, Leonard Vertighel, Lyle Neff, Wiki Admins

Post Reply
rdh
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2023 2:24 am
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human

Mademoiselle, not Madame Rochette

Post by rdh »

https://imslp.org/wiki/Madame_Rochette% ... _(Various)

The owner of the manuscript was Mademoiselle Rochette, not Madame Rochette.

See the fifth image in the file and the article by Richard Sutcliffe in Journal of the Viola da Gamba Society, vol. 2 (2009), p. 1, https://vdgs.org.uk/journal/Vol-02-2.pdf

Could someone who has the privileges to move the page (I don't) please make the correction.
michaelarrington
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2025 7:27 am
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human

Re: Mademoiselle, not Madame Rochette

Post by michaelarrington »

rdh wrote: Mon Jun 30, 2025 1:31 am https://imslp.org/wiki/Madame_Rochette% ... _(Various)

The owner of the manuscript was Mademoiselle Rochette, not Madame Rochette.

See the fifth image in the file and the article by Richard Sutcliffe in Journal of the Viola da Gamba Society, vol. 2 (2009), p. 1, https://vdgs.org.uk/journal/Vol-02-2.pdf PolyTrack

Could someone who has the privileges to move the page (I don't) please make the correction.
Thanks for pointing out the error regarding Mademoiselle Rochette! The evidence from the fifth image in the IMSLP file and Richard Sutcliffe’s article in the Journal of the Viola da Gamba Society (Vol. 2, 2009, p. 1) clearly confirms the manuscript owner was Mademoiselle, not Madame, Rochette.
Post Reply