Page 1 of 1
Did Penderecki Go Too Far?
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 8:13 pm
by allegroamabile
I would like to ask what the classical music community thinks of Penderecki's Threnody for the Victims of Hiroshima. Was he too extreme or is it pure innovative beauty?
Re: Did Penderecki Go Too Far?
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 8:31 pm
by vinteuil
The latter, definitely. There is no "too extreme" when something is that well-written.
Re: Did Penderecki Go Too Far?
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:49 pm
by allegroamabile
To just put it out there, I appreciate the piece, not dislike it. I think it would be better fit as incidental music though.
Re: Did Penderecki Go Too Far?
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 3:19 am
by Yagan Kiely
Just remember he only applied the (apt) Hiroshima attacks after he wrote the piece, he didn't write the piece for it/them.
There is absolutely nothing beautiful about the piece, it is the most vile horrible piece out there, and that is why it is so good!
Re: Did Penderecki Go Too Far?
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:17 pm
by allegroamabile
It was originally going to be called 8'37, as a hommage to John Cage. Too bad it took third prize in the competition it participated in.
Re: Did Penderecki Go Too Far?
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:13 pm
by vinteuil
I didn't say it was beautiful. I said well-written - Late Beethoven is often not beautiful, but it is sublime. This piece approaches the same standard. It is incredible.
Re: Did Penderecki Go Too Far?
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:21 pm
by Yagan Kiely
Title Post mentioned beauty. Beauty is very much overrated in music. Imagine if every piece was perfectly beautiful, be wonderful for a little while then it would get dreadfully boring.
Re: Did Penderecki Go Too Far?
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 6:18 pm
by Lyle Neff
Yagan Kiely wrote:Title Post mentioned beauty. Beauty is very much overrated in music. Imagine if every piece was perfectly beautiful, be wonderful for a little while then it would get dreadfully boring.
So would all-ugliness.
Re: Did Penderecki Go Too Far?
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:23 pm
by vinteuil
That's why variety exists...and why we can still like Dufay even though we've "advanced" since then.
Re: Did Penderecki Go Too Far?
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 3:45 am
by Yagan Kiely
Early romantic philosophy was obsessed with beauty that's all.
Re: Did Penderecki Go Too Far?
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:52 pm
by vinteuil
Berlioz?? He was fantastic at making horrific-sounding things as imagery.
Re: Did Penderecki Go Too Far?
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 3:44 am
by Yagan Kiely
I said philosophy.
Re: Did Penderecki Go Too Far?
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 3:59 am
by vinteuil
True enough. I withdraw the previous.
Re: Did Penderecki Go Too Far?
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 10:09 pm
by gardano
The Threnody is an amazing piece.
I must admit that listening to a recording of a (violin?) concerto, I think with Isaac Stern, is the only instance I can remember that a piece of music made me physically sick. Does that count as beautiful? no. Effective? Well, I think that defines it!
Would I listen to Penderecki again? No, probably not.
Re: Did Penderecki Go Too Far?
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:43 pm
by allegroamabile
gardano wrote:The Threnody is an amazing piece.
I must admit that listening to a recording of a (violin?) concerto, I think with Isaac Stern, is the only instance I can remember that a piece of music made me physically sick.
I remember listening to Charles Ives's General William Booth Enter into Heaven and the dissonance in that piece causing me to feel very nauseous, so I know exactly what you were going through