Persuading estates to convert non-PD works to CC
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:33 am
It is widely known that Chinese symphonic works are notoriously difficult to get because they are usually only printed *once* in a small run during the first publication and then *NOT* reprinted. As a result, many magnificent Chinese symphonic works remain unknown to the rest of the world. Therefore I believe that IMSLP/IMDBP and Creative Commons are the best ways to make Chinese compositions known to the rest of the world.
There are some deceased Chinese composer whose copyright are still effective. The first hurdle would be to persuade estates of deceased composers to change the license of their works to Creative Commons.
Once they principally agree, then is it true that the estate now need to establish whether they have the copyright or the publisher has the copyright? I know that there are three types of copyrights:
composer
editor
typesetter
So is it correct that the estates must ensure that the publisher must *not* own the composer copyright?
Then I have to make sure that the score I get does not have significant modifications from any external editor (which is unlikely for the composer in my mind), and once I reach this stage, all I have to do is to re-typeset the works to circumvent the *typesetter's* copyright. Am I correct?
I am new to copyright handling and please give me more guidance.
If you are Feldmahler, or are genuinely interested in Chinese Symphonic works and have contacts with Creative Commons or live in Philadelphia (where I believe most of the relatives live in), please send me a private message offline to discuss about persuading the estate of the composer in my mind.
There are some deceased Chinese composer whose copyright are still effective. The first hurdle would be to persuade estates of deceased composers to change the license of their works to Creative Commons.
Once they principally agree, then is it true that the estate now need to establish whether they have the copyright or the publisher has the copyright? I know that there are three types of copyrights:
composer
editor
typesetter
So is it correct that the estates must ensure that the publisher must *not* own the composer copyright?
Then I have to make sure that the score I get does not have significant modifications from any external editor (which is unlikely for the composer in my mind), and once I reach this stage, all I have to do is to re-typeset the works to circumvent the *typesetter's* copyright. Am I correct?
I am new to copyright handling and please give me more guidance.
If you are Feldmahler, or are genuinely interested in Chinese Symphonic works and have contacts with Creative Commons or live in Philadelphia (where I believe most of the relatives live in), please send me a private message offline to discuss about persuading the estate of the composer in my mind.