Titelouze, Magnificat tertii Toni

Any posts related to the categorization and standardization of IMSLP

Moderators: vinteuil, Davydov

Post Reply
steltz
active poster
Posts: 1861
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:30 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human

Titelouze, Magnificat tertii Toni

Post by steltz »

I am trying to tag this, and it is confusing that it is not sung, but for organ. I came across another work called a "Magnificat Fugue", also for organ only, and tagged it as a fugue because it isn't the Magnificat as such.

But with the Titelouze, there isn't the luxury of such a title, though it contains 7 fugues, all for organ.

Tag as "fugues"?
bsteltz
Davydov
Copyright Reviewer
Posts: 817
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 8:31 am
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human
Contact:

Re: Titelouze, Magnificat tertii Toni

Post by Davydov »

It's always the composer's designation that takes priority, so "magnificats" is the correct tag. We already have hymns and masses for solo organ, so it's not straying too far from the pack :)
steltz
active poster
Posts: 1861
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:30 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human

Re: Titelouze, Magnificat tertii Toni

Post by steltz »

Done! Next question: was it correct, then, in the Magnificat Fugue to take "Magnificat" as an adjective and "Fugue" as the taggable noun?
bsteltz
Davydov
Copyright Reviewer
Posts: 817
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 8:31 am
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human
Contact:

Re: Titelouze, Magnificat tertii Toni

Post by Davydov »

If it had been "Magnificat-Fugue" then I'd have recommended tagging both parts (as we would do in "Valse-Scherzo" or "Scherzo-Fantasie", for example). The absence of the hyphen makes it more ambiguous, so it depends whether you think the original title was grammatically accurate or not :)
Rob Peters
active poster
Posts: 118
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:43 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human

Re: Titelouze, Magnificat tertii Toni

Post by Rob Peters »

Versets, used in combination with gregorian chant aren't that rare in organ literature. It's a standard genre in baroque literature, be it (organ-)masses, hymns, versper chants etc.
The basic principle was always gregorian chant alternating with organ versets, so that the choir would start with the first verse, then the organ would play a short piece instead of the second verse, then the choir again, and so forth.

In the case of Titelouze, I would advice against using the word "fugue", it's an anachronism. Just "Magnificat" will do nicely.
steltz
active poster
Posts: 1861
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:30 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human

Re: Titelouze, Magnificat tertii Toni

Post by steltz »

The problem with that solution is that the word "fugue" is in the title, and as Davydov said when I asked about a purely instrumental Magnificat,
It's always the composer's designation that takes priority
I can't think of any language where the adjective comes after the noun, so the word "fugue" has to be a noun. The only two possibilities I see here are "fugues" or "magnificats ; fugues".
bsteltz
KGill
Copyright Reviewer
Posts: 1295
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 10:16 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human

Re: Titelouze, Magnificat tertii Toni

Post by KGill »

steltz wrote:I can't think of any language where the adjective comes after the noun ...
Well, for a start, how about all the Romance languages? Though I think it's clear anyway that the word fugue here refers to the musical form and does not serve to describe, say, the fugue state in which one might find oneself during a performance of the work. Are you sure, though, that the hyphenless title is really the accurate one? (It looks a little odd to me, just a feeling though.)
Post Reply