Piano reduction = urtext?

Specific copyright information. If you're not sure if you can upload your score, ask it here first

Moderators: kcleung, Copyright Reviewers

Post Reply
bicinium
active poster
Posts: 121
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 10:54 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human

Piano reduction = urtext?

Post by bicinium »

This has been bugging me for a little while; how can the piano reduction of Vanhal's double bass concerto edited by Rudolf Malarić be an urtext edition if it is itself an arrangement? We know for a fact that it isn't the composer's piano reduction, because the only source we have is the set of parts that is also on IMSLP (praise be).

I've got another Doblinger/Malarić publication in a similar predicament.
Carolus
Site Admin
Posts: 2249
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 11:18 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human
Contact:

Re: Piano reduction = urtext?

Post by Carolus »

That gets complicated sometimes. It really boils down to the question of whether or not the piano reduction is something more than a mere transcription of the bass line and the violin parts (plus some fill) into 2 staves or not. Lots of piano reductions of older music fall into this category and thus fail to meet the threshold of originality as there are a number of conductor/pianists who can create such reductions on the fly from a full score.
Sallen112
active poster
Posts: 903
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 12:52 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human

Re: Piano reduction = urtext?

Post by Sallen112 »

It also comes down to if the arranged setting has new original contributions specific to the edition (if the editor added any) that would determine from a normal published edition vs. a scientific (urtext) edition. If the edition has anything original not done by the original composer, then under copyright protection could come into play here.
Post Reply