Read the rest. I was not angry at any IMSLP member, and I have never been, even in the one case where others might have gotten upset, and I don't think it would be a good idea to discuss that any further.duncancourts wrote:Not sure of the need to be angry.I was a little angry
Tournemire - L'Orgue Mystique [Copyright Status]
Moderators: kcleung, Copyright Reviewers
-
- Groundskeeper
- Posts: 1445
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 3:01 pm
- notabot: YES
- notabot2: Bot
- Location: U.S.A.
- Contact:
Re: Tournemire - L'Orgue Mystique [Copyright Status]
Formerly known as "perlnerd666"
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 5:16 pm
- notabot: 42
- notabot2: Human
Re: Tournemire - L'Orgue Mystique [Copyright Status]
Many thanks for a clear and logical explanation. I think it's a shame that the US law manages to affect transactions which, from my point of view, don't involve the US, but I well understand the need to guard the project against mischievous litigation.